N04 基础标准与通用方法 标准查询与下载

JIS Z 8462-1:2001 探测能力.第1部分:术语和定义

この規格では，実際に調べようとていろ測定対象系の状態と，基底状態(プランク状態)との差の検出に関連すろ用語及び定義を規定する。

Capability of detection -- Part 1: Terms and definitions

DIN V 12900-3:2001 实验室数据通信.第3部分:实验室仪器的设备外形

The document defines the data communication between laboratory apparatus and computer performed with multipoint connections via a process field bus, e.g. profibus according to DIN EN 50170/2 or DIN measurement bus acc. to DIN 66348. The specified device profiles are independent from the bus chosen and fit into the OSI Basic Reference Model according to DIN EN ISO/IEC 7498-1 oven layer 7.#,,#

Laboratory data communication - Part 3: Device profiles for laboratory apparatus

ANSI/ASTM E4:2001 材料试验机加力振动惯例

These practices cover procedures for the force verification, by means of standard calibration devices, of tension or compression, or both, static or quasi-static testing machines (which may, or may not, have force-indicating systems). These practices are not intended to be complete purchase specifications for testing machines. Testing machines may be verified by one of the three following methods or combination thereof: Use of standard weights, Use of equal-arm balances and standard weights, or Use of elastic calibration devices. Note 1--These practices do not cover the verification of all types of testing machines designed to measure forces, for example, the constant-rate-of-loading type which operates on the inclined-plane principle. This type of machine may be verified as directed in the applicable appendix of Specification D76. The procedures of apply to the verification of the force-indicating systems associated with the testing machine, such as a scale, dial, marked or unmarked recorder chart, digital display, etc. In all cases the buyer/owner/user must designate the force-indicating system(s) to be verified and included in the report. Since conversion factors are not required in this practice, either inch-pound units, SI units, or metric values can be used as the standard. Forces indicated on displays/printouts of testing machine data systems-be they instantaneous, delayed, stored, or retransmitted-which are verified with provisions of , and are within the 1 % accuracy requirement, comply with Practices E4. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Practice for Force Verification of Testing Machines

ASTM D6708-01e1 测量材料相同性质的两种试验方法间预期一致性的改进和统计学评估的标准实施规范

1.1 This practice defines statistical methodology for assessing the expected agreement between two standard test methods that purport to measure the same property of a material, and deciding if a simple linear bias correction can further improve the expected agreement. It is intended for use with results collected from an interlaboratory study meeting the requirement of Practice D 6300 or equivalent (for example, ISO 4259). The interlaboratory study must be conducted on at least ten materials that span the intersecting scopes of the test methods, and results must be obtained from at least six laboratories using each method.Note 1--Examples of standard test methods are those developed by voluntary consensus standards bodies such as ASTM, IP/BSI, DIN, AFNOR, CGSB.1.2 The statistical methodology is based on the premise that a bias correction will not be needed. In the absence of strong statistical evidence that a bias correction would result in better agreement between the two methods, a bias correction is not made. If a bias correction is required, then the parsimony principle is followed whereby a simple correction is to be favored over a more complex one.Note 2--Failure to adhere to the parsimony principle generally results in models that are over-fitted and do not perform well in practice.1.3 The bias corrections of this practice are limited to a constant correction, proportional correction or a linear (proportional + constant) correction.1.4 The bias-correction methods of this practice are method symmetric, in the sense that equivalent corrections are obtained regardless of which method is bias-corrected to match the other.1.5 A methodology is presented for establishing the 95 % confidence limit (designated by this practice as the cross-method reproducibility) for the difference between two results where each result is obtained by a different operator using different apparatus and each applying one of the two methods X and Y on identical material, where one of the methods has been appropriately bias-corrected in accordance with this practice.Note 3--Users are cautioned against applying the cross-method reproducibility as calculated from this practice to materials that are significantly different in composition from those actually studied, as the ability of this practice to detect and address sample-specific biases (see 6.8) is dependent on the materials selected for the interlaboratory study. When sample-specific biases are present, the types and ranges of samples may need to be expanded significantly from the minimum of ten as specified in this practice in order to obtain a more comprehensive and reliable 95 % confidence limits for cross method reproducibility that adequately cover the range of sample specific biases for different types of materials.1.6 This practice is intended for test methods which measure quantitative (numerical) properties of petroleum or petroleum products.

Standard Practice for Statistical Assessment and Improvement of the Expected Agreement Between Two Test Methods that Purport to Measure the Same Property of a Material

ASTM D6708-01 测量材料相同性质的两种试验方法间预期一致性的改进和统计学评估的标准实施规范

1.1 This practice defines statistical methodology for assessing the expected agreement between two standard test methods that purport to measure the same property of a material, and deciding if a simple linear bias correction can further improve the expected agreement. It is intended for use with results collected from an interlaboratory study meeting the requirement of Practice D 6300 or equivalent (for example, ISO 4259). The interlaboratory study must be conducted on at least ten materials that span the intersecting scopes of the test methods, and results must be obtained from at least six laboratories using each method.Note 1--Examples of standard test methods are those developed by voluntary consensus standards bodies such as ASTM, IP/BSI, DIN, AFNOR, CGSB.1.2 The statistical methodology is based on the premise that a bias correction will not be needed. In the absence of strong statistical evidence that a bias correction would result in better agreement between the two methods, a bias correction is not made. If a bias correction is required, then the parsimony principle is followed whereby a simple correction is to be favored over a more complex one.Note 2--Failure to adhere to the parsimony principle generally results in models that are over-fitted and do not perform well in practice.1.3 The bias corrections of this practice are limited to a constant correction, proportional correction or a linear (proportional + constant) correction.1.4 The bias-correction methods of this practice are method symmetric, in the sense that equivalent corrections are obtained regardless of which method is bias-corrected to match the other.1.5 A methodology is presented for establishing the 95 % confidence limit (designated by this practice as the cross-method reproducibility) for the difference between two results where each result is obtained by a different operator using different apparatus and each applying one of the two methods X and Y on identical material, where one of the methods has been appropriately bias-corrected in accordance with this practice.Note 3--Users are cautioned against applying the cross-method reproducibility as calculated from this practice to materials that are significantly different in composition from those actually studied, as the ability of this practice to detect and address sample-specific biases (see 6.8) is dependent on the materials selected for the interlaboratory study. When sample-specific biases are present, the types and ranges of samples may need to be expanded significantly from the minimum of ten as specified in this practice in order to obtain a more comprehensive and reliable 95 % confidence limits for cross method reproducibility that adequately cover the range of sample specific biases for different types of materials.1.6 This practice is intended for test methods which measure quantitative (numerical) properties of petroleum or petroleum products.

Standard Practice for Statistical Assessment and Improvement of the Expected Agreement Between Two Test Methods that Purport to Measure the Same Property of a Material

ANSI/ASTM E11:2001 线织试验筛规范

This specification covers the requirements for design and construction of testing sieves using a medium of woven wire cloth mounted in a frame for use in testing for the classification of materials according to designated particle size (See Note 1 and Note 2), and wire cloth, meeting the specifications of , to be designated test grade wire cloth. All subsequent references to wire cloth shall mean test grade wire cloth. Methods for checking testing sieves and wire cloth for conformance to this specification are included in the annex. Note 1-Complete instructions and procedures on the use and calibration of testing sieves are contained in ASTM STP447B. Note that sieve analysis results from two testing sieves of the same sieve designation may not be the same because of the variances in sieve opening permitted by this specification. To minimize the differences in sieve analysis results, the use of testing sieves matched on a performance basis is suggested. ASTM STP447B also contains a list of all published ASTM standards on sieve analysis procedures for specific materials or industries. This list may be referenced to obtain statements of precision and bias for sieve analysis of specific materials. Note 2-For other types of sieves, see Specification E323 and Specification E161. The values stated in SI units shall be considered standard for the dimensions of the wire cloth openings and the diameter of the wires used in the wire cloth. The values stated in inch-pound units shall be considered standard with regard to the sieve frames. The following precautionary statement refers only to the test method portion, Annex A1, of this specification:This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Specification for Wire-Cloth Sieves for Testing Purposes

ASTM D6699-01(2006) 使用提桶进行液体取样的标准实施规范

A bailer is a device for obtaining a sample from stratified or un-stratified waters and liquid wastes. The most common use of a bailer is for sampling ground water from single-screened wells (Fig. 1) and well clusters (see Guide D 4448). This practice is applicable to sampling water and liquid wastes. The sampling procedure will depend on sampling plan and the data quality objectives (DQOs) (Practice D 5792). Bailers may be used to purge ground water wells prior to sampling, but bailers are poor devices for removing large volumes of water. Bailers may be used to sample waters and liquid wastes in underground and above ground tanks and surface impoundments. However, the design of the unit and associated piping should be well understood so that the bailer can access the desired compartment and depth. Any stratification of the liquid should be identified prior to sampling. Note 18212;Viscous liquids and suspended solids may interfere with a bailerrsquo;designed operation. Bailers do not subject the sample to pressure extremes. Bailing does disturb the water column and may cause changes to the parameters to be measured (for example, turbidity, gases, etc.).1.1 This practice covers the procedure for sampling stratified or un-stratified waters and liquid waste using bailers.1.2 Three specific bailers are discussed in this practice. The bailers are the single and double check valve and differential pressure.1.3 This standard does not cover all of the bailing devices available to the user. The bailers chosen for this practice are typical of those commercially available.1.4 This practice should be used in conjunction with Guide D 4687, Practice D 5088, and Practice D 5283.1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Sampling Liquids Using Bailers

ASTM E4-01 试验机的负荷校准的标准实施规程

1.1 These practices cover procedures for the force verification, by means of standard calibration devices, of tension or compression, or both, static or quasi-static testing machines (which may, or may not, have force-indicating systems). These practices are not intended to be complete purchase specifications for testing machines. Testing machines may be verified by one of the three following methods or combination thereof:1.1.1 Use of standard weights,1.1.2 Use of equal-arm balances and standard weights, or1.1.3 Use of elastic calibration devices. Note 1--These practices do not cover the verification of all types of testing machines designed to measure forces, for example, the constant-rate-of-loading type which operates on the inclined-plane principle. This type of machine may be verified as directed in the applicable appendix of Specification D76.1.2 The procedures of 1.1.1 - 1.1.3 apply to the verification of the force-indicating systems associated with the testing machine, such as a scale, dial, marked or unmarked recorder chart, digital display, etc. In all cases the buyer/owner/user must designate the force-indicating system(s) to be verified and included in the report.1.3 Since conversion factors are not required in this practice, either inch-pound units, SI units, or metric values can be used as the standard.1.4 Forces indicated on displays/printouts of testing machine data systems-be they instantaneous, delayed, stored, or retransmitted-which are verified with provisions of 1.1.1, 1.1.2 or 1.1.3 , and are within the 1 % accuracy requirement, comply with Practices E4.1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines

ASTM D6699-01(2010) 用水斗取液体样的标准操作规程

A bailer is a device for obtaining a sample from stratified or un-stratified waters and liquid wastes. The most common use of a bailer is for sampling ground water from single-screened wells (Fig. 1) and well clusters (see Guide D4448). This practice is applicable to sampling water and liquid wastes. The sampling procedure will depend on sampling plan and the data quality objectives (DQOs) (Practice D5792). Bailers may be used to purge ground water wells prior to sampling, but bailers are poor devices for removing large volumes of water. Bailers may be used to sample waters and liquid wastes in underground and above ground tanks and surface impoundments. However, the design of the unit and associated piping should be well understood so that the bailer can access the desired compartment and depth. Any stratification of the liquid should be identified prior to sampling. Note 18212;Viscous liquids and suspended solids may interfere with a bailer''s designed operation. Bailers do not subject the sample to pressure extremes. Bailing does disturb the water column and may cause changes to the parameters to be measured (for example, turbidity, gases, etc.).1.1 This practice covers the procedure for sampling stratified or un-stratified waters and liquid waste using bailers. 1.2 Three specific bailers are discussed in this practice. The bailers are the single and double check valve and differential pressure. 1.3 This standard does not cover all of the bailing devices available to the user. The bailers chosen for this practice are typical of those commercially available. 1.4 This practice should be used in conjunction with Guide D4687, Practice D5088, and Practice D5283. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Sampling Liquids Using Bailers

HG/T 20507-2000 自动化仪表选型设计规定

本规定适用于工装置温度仪表的选型。

Design code for selection of instrument type

DIN V 55394-2:2000 用实验室间比较法进行熟练检验.第2部分:实验室认证机构对实验室熟练检验方法的选择及运用

The document covers the selection and use of proficiency testing schemes by laboratory accreditation bodies.

Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons - Part 2: Selection and use of proficiency testing schemes by laboratory accreditation bodies (ISO/IEC Guide 43-2:1997)

DIN V 55394-1:2000 实验室比较熟练检验.第1部分:实验室熟练检验方法的制定及运用

The document covers the development and operation of proficiency testing schemes for proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons.

Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons - Part 1: Development and operation of proficiency testing schemes (ISO/IEC Guide 43-1:1997)

DIN EN ISO 10360-3:2000 产品几何量规范(GPS).坐标测量机(CMM)的验收和复检试验.第3部分:旋转台的轴线作为第四轴线的坐标测量机

The document specifies the acceptance test which verifies that the performance of a four-axis coordinate measuring machine (CMM) is in accordance with that stated by the manufacturer. It also specifies the reverification test, which enables the user to reverify the performance of a four-axis CMM periodically. The acceptance test and reverification test described are applicable only to four-axis machines with three axes for measuring workpiece coordinates, plus a rotary table for orienting the workpiece.

Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Acceptance test and reverification test for coordinate measuring machines (CMM) - Part 3: CMMs with the axis of a rotary table as the fourth axis (ISO 10360-3:2000); German version EN ISO 10360-3:2000

JIS Z 8103:2000 测量用术语集

この規格は，鉱工業における計測に関する主な用語について規定する。

Glossary of terms used in measurement

JIS Q 17020:2000 各类执行检查的工作机构的一般工作准则

この規格は，関係する分野にかかわりなく，検査を行う公平な機関の能力に関する一般基準を規定する。

General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection

JIS Q 17025:2000 试验和校正试验室能力的一般要求

General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories

BS ISO 11843-2:2000 检测能力.线性校准方法体系

To be read in conjunction with BS ISO 11843-1:2000

Capability of detection. Methodology in the linear calibration case

IEC TR 61010-3-032:2000 测量、控制和实验室用电气设备的安全要求 第3-032部分:IEC 61010-2-032-1994《电气测量和试验用手持式电流夹的特殊要求》的一致性验证报告

Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control, and laboratory use - Part 3-032: Conformity verification report for IEC 61010-2-032:1994 - Particular requirements for hand-held current clamps for electrical measurement and test

AIR FORCE MIL-HDBK-1839 A-2000 校准和测量要求

This military handbook is approved for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense.

CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS

ASTM D3609-00(2010) 使用渗透管校准技术的标准实施规程

Most analytical methods used in air pollutant measurements are comparative in nature and require calibration or standardization, or both, often with known blends of the gas of interest. Since many of the important air pollutants are reactive and unstable, it is difficult to store them as standard mixtures of known concentration for extended calibration purposes. An alternative is to prepare dynamically standard blends as required. This procedure is simplified if a constant source of the gas of interest can be provided. Permeation tubes provide this constant source, if properly calibrated and if maintained at constant temperature. Permeation tubes have been specified as reference calibration sources, for certain analytical procedures, by the Environmental Protection Agency (3).1.1 This practice describes a means for using permeation tubes for dynamically calibrating instruments, analyzers, and analytical procedures used in measuring concentrations of gases or vapors in atmospheres (1,2). 1.2 Typical materials that may be sealed in permeation tubes include: sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, chlorine, ammonia, propane, and butane (1). 1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Practice for Calibration Techniques Using Permeation Tubes