P22 地基、基础工程 标准查询与下载



共找到 352 条与 地基、基础工程 相关的标准,共 24

本规程适用于铁路工程地基处理的设计、施工和质量检验。

Technical Code for Ground Treatment of Railway Engineering

ICS
CCS
P22
发布
2010-08-03
实施
2010-08-03

本规程适用于地下工程渗漏的治理。

Technical specification for remedial waterproofing of the underground works

ICS
CCS
P22
发布
2010-08-03
实施
2011-01-01

本规程适用于建筑、市政工程软土地基处理中桩径为1000mm-1250mm的现浇混凝土大直径管桩复合地基的设计、施工和质量检验。

Technical specification for composite foundation of cast-in-place concrete large-diameter pipe pile

ICS
P22
CCS
P22
发布
2010-07-23
实施
2011-03-01

本规程适用于建筑与市政工程刚-柔性桩复合地基的设计、施工及质量检测。

Technical specification for rigid-flexible pile composite foundation

ICS
CCS
P22
发布
2010-04-14
实施
2010-09-01

5.1 These test methods are used as an integral part of several engineering classification systems to characterize the fine-grained fractions of soils (see Practices D2487 and D3282) and to specify the fine-grained fraction of construction materials (see Specification D1241). The liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils are also used extensively, either individually or together, with other soil properties to correlate with engineering behavior such as compressibility, hydraulic conductivity (permeability), compactibility, shrink-swell, and shear strength. 5.2 The liquid and plastic limits of a soil and its water content can be used to express its relative consistency or liquidity index. In addition, the plasticity index and the percentage finer than 2-μm particle size can be used to determine its activity number. 5.3 These methods are sometimes used to evaluate the weathering characteristics of clay-shale materials. When subjected to repeated wetting and drying cycles, the liquid limits of these materials tend to increase. The amount of increase is considered to be a measure of a shale's susceptibility to weathering. 5.4 The liquid limit of a soil containing substantial amounts of organic matter decreases dramatically when the soil is oven-dried before testing. Comparison of the liquid limit of a sample before and after oven-drying can therefore be used as a qualitative measure of organic matter content of a soil (see Practice D2487.Note 1—The quality of the result produced by this standard is dependent on the competence of the personnel performing it and the suitability of the equipment and facilities used. Agencies that meet the criteria of Practice D3740, generally, are considered capable of competent and objective testing/sampling/inspection/etc. Users of this standard are cautioned that compliance with Practice D3740 does not in itself assure reliable results. Reliable results depend on many factors; Practice D3740 provides a means of evaluating some of those factors. 1.1 These test methods cover the determination of the liquid limit, plastic limit, and the plasticity index of soils as defined in Section 3 on Terminology. 1.2 Two methods for preparing test specimens are provided as follows: Wet preparation method, as described in 10.1. Dry preparation method, as described in 10.2. The method to be used shall be specified by the requesting authority. If no method is specified, use the wet preparation method. 1.2.1 The liquid and plastic limits of many soils that have been allowed to dry before testing may be considerably different from values obtained on non-dried samples. If the liquid and plastic limits of soils are used to correlate or estimate the engineering behavior of soils in their natural moist state, samples should not be permitted to dry before testing unless data on dried samples are specifically desired. 1.3 Two methods for determining the liquid limit are provided as follows: Method A, Multipoint test as described in Sections 11 and

Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils

ICS
93.020 (Earth works. Excavations. Foundation const
CCS
P22
发布
2010
实施

Based on the measurements of force and displacement at the pile top, possibly combined with those from acceleration or strain transducers located further down the pile, these test methods measure the pile top deflection in response to an axial compressive force pulse. The relatively long duration of the force pulse compared to the natural period of the test pile causes the pile to compress and translate approximately as a unit during a portion of the pulse, simultaneously mobilizing compressive axial static capacity and dynamic resistance at all points along the length of the pile for that portion of the test. The Engineer may analyze the acquired data using engineering principles and judgment to evaluate the performance of the force pulse apparatus, and the characteristics of the pile's response to the force pulse loading. If significant permanent axial movement occurs during the axial force pulse event, the Engineer may analyze the results of the test to estimate, after assessing inertial effects and the dynamic soil and rock response along the side and bottom of the pile, the ultimate axial static compression capacity (see Note 2). The scope of this standard does not include analysis for either ultimate or design foundation capacity. Factors that may affect the axial static capacity estimated from force pulse tests include, but are not limited to, the: (1) pile installation equipment and procedures, (2) elapsed time since initial installation, (3) pile material properties and dimensions, (4) type, density, strength, stratification, and saturation of the soil, or rock, or both adjacent to and beneath the pile, (5) quality of force pulse test data, (6) foundation settlement, (7) analysis method, and (8) engineering judgment and experience. If the Engineer does not have adequate previous experience with these factors, and with the analysis of force pulse test data, then a static load test carried out according to Test Method D1143 should be used to verify estimates of static capacity and its distribution along the pile length. Test Method D1143 provides a direct and more reliable measurement of static capacity. Note 28212;If a force pulse test produces insufficient axial movement, subsequent analysis may overestimate the static capacity because of difficulty in separating the static and dynamic components of the response. The analysis of a force pulse test to estimate static capacity also typically includes a reduction factor to account for the additional load resistance that occurs as a result of a faster rate of loading than used during a static test. Force pulse test results from cohesive soils generally require a greater reduction factor due to the rate of loading effect, chosen conservatively to produce a lower static capacity estimate. The Engineer should determine how the type, size, and shape of the pile, and the properties of the soil or rock beneath and adjacent to the pile, affect the rate-of-loading reduction factors and the amount of movement required to mobilize and accurately assess the static capacity. Correlations between actual measurements and force pulse estimates of the ultimate axial static compression capacity generally improve when using additional transducers embedded in the pile. Static capacity may also change over time after the pile installation, especially for driven piles. Both static and force pulse tests represent the capacity at the time of the respective test, and correlation attempts should provide results for a.......

Standard Test Methods for Axial Compressive Force Pulse (Rapid) Testing of Deep Foundations

ICS
93.020
CCS
P22
发布
2010
实施

The Technical Reference is specific to the design and construction of deep excavations. Deep excavation refers to any excavates which has a retained height or excavation depth of 6 m or more. This includes shafts, trenches, cofferdams, marine or land retaining structures with walls, both temporary and permanent, ranging from free-standing gravity walls to multi-braced or anchored embedded walls. For a sloping ground behind the retaining wall, the height is taken to be from the excavated level to the top of slope. The excavation depth includes smaller but separate excavations or holes which extend beyond the main excavation level for construction of pile caps, pump sumps, lift pits etc. This Technical Reference is also applicable to situations where the excavation depth or retained height is less than 6 m if any of the following conditions is met: a) There are adjacent structures within a horizontal distance of less than the excavation depth from the excavation face that are vulnerable to or likely to be adversely affected by the excavation works; b) Ground conditions are poor; or c) Lowering of groundwater table will likely lead to significant consolidation settlements in surrounding ground.

Technical reference for deep excavation

ICS
93.020
CCS
P22
发布
2010
实施

This guide is intended to be used by architects, engineers, and contractors who either design or install exterior stone cladding for architectural structures. This guide is an industry standard for engineering design considerations, documentation, material considerations, anchor type applications, and installation workmanship to assist designers and installers to achieve a proper and durable stone cladding. Stone and its support systems are part of a building's skin and shall be compatible with the behavior and performance of other interfacing systems, such as the curtainwall and superstructure frame. Every stone work application shall comply with applicable building codes. It is not the intent of this Guide to supercede published recommendations for specific stone types. Provisions of other dimension stone industry publications should be reviewed and considered in addition to this Guide's recommendations. All industry information should be considered with respect to project specifications and requirements. If provisions of such publications differ from those in this Guide, it is acceptable practice to follow the publication's provisions if recommended by the stone specialist defined in 4.4 for the specific conditions of the individual project. Because stone properties vary, the range and variability of pertinent properties of the stone proposed for use should be determined by testing and statistical methods that are evaluated using sound engineering principles. Use recent test data where applicable. Always reference proven performance of relevant existing structures. Changes in properties over time shall be considered. Overall behaviors of all building systems and components including the stone shall be interactively compatible. Stone Specialist8212;Some conditions require professional expertise to select and plan a proper anchoring system, establish appropriate testing requirements, interpret tests, design and engineer the anchoring system, or monitor its fabrication and installation. A specialist is a person that complements the capabilities of the project team by contributing specific expert experience with the use, selection, design, and installation of dimension stone. Particular conditions where special expertise is suggested to achieve a reliable installation: Where complex connections or anchoring methods of unknown or questionable performance records are likely to be considered or specified; Where the performance record of the specified systems and materials is not known or questionable; When multiple cladding materials occur on the same facade; If the supporting structure or backup is more flexible than L/600 in any direction; If extreme loading could be caused by seismic, hurricane, tornado, or installation and handling methods; When special building code requirements prevail. If provisions of stone industry publications or project specifications differ from this guide.1.1 This guide covers the categories of anchors and anchoring systems and discusses the design principles to be considered in selecting anchors or systems that will resist gravity loads and applied loads. 1.2 This guide sets forth basic requirements for the design of stone anchorage and provides a practical checklist of those design considerations. 1.3 This guide pertains to: 1.3.1 The anchoring of stone panels directly to the building structure for support, 1.3.2 The anchoring of stone panels to subframes or to curtainwall components after these support systems are attached to the building structure, 1.3.3 The anchoring of stone panels to subframes or to curtainwall components with stone cladding preassembled before t......

Standard Guide for Selection, Design, and Installation of Dimension Stone Attachment Systems

ICS
93.020
CCS
P22
发布
2010
实施

This British Standard gives recommendations and provides guidance on methods of dealing with and preventing the entry of water from surrounding ground into a structure below ground level. It covers the use of: a) waterproofing barrier materials applied to the structure, b) structurally integral watertight construction; and c) drained cavity construction. It also covers the evaluation of groundwater conditions, risk assessment and options for drainage outside the structure. It applies to structures which extend below ground level and those on sloping sites. This British Standard does not give recommendations concerning the use of embedded heating in structures, floors and walls or for the special requirements in connection with the design and construction of cold stores.

Code of practice for protection of below ground structures against water from the ground

ICS
91.120.30
CCS
P22
发布
2009-11-30
实施
2009-11-30

本规程适用于地基土为黏性土及中密、稍密的砂土的逆作复合桩基的设计、施工、检测及验收,也适用于既有建筑物的地基基础加固;不适用于高灵敏性的黏性土。

Technical specification for composite pile foundation with top-down method

ICS
CCS
P22
发布
2009-10-30
实施
2010-07-01

Design specification for cast-in-place piles with expanded branches and bells by 3-way extruding arms

ICS
93.020
CCS
P22
发布
2009-10-01
实施
2009-10-01

本规程适用于新建、改建铁路路基工程施工。

Safety Constructional Regulations for Railway Subgrade Engineering

ICS
CCS
P22
发布
2009-09-24
实施
2009-09-24

本规程适用于陆上真空预压加固软土地基工程的设计、施工、施工监控和加固效果检测。潮间带区域的工程可参照执行。

Technical Specification for Vacuum Preloading Technique to Improve Soft Soils

ICS
CCS
P22
发布
2009-08-09
实施
2009-11-01

Ground - Verification of the safety of earthworks and foundations; Amendment A1

ICS
93.020
CCS
P22
发布
2009-07
实施

本规程适用于新建、扩建和改建的给类建筑室内自流平地面工程的设计、施工、质量检验与验收。 自流平地面工程的设计、施工与质量检验与验收,除符合本规程外,尚应符合国家现行有关标准的规定。

Technical specification of self-leveling flooring construction

ICS
CCS
P22
发布
2009-05-19
实施
2009-12-01

为了在建设工程基桩孔内摄像检测中,做到技术先进、准确直观,制定本规程。 本规程适用于建设工程基桩中的空心桩的完整性检测及对钻有坚向孔的灌注桩进行验证检测。 对基桩进行孔内摄像检测,除应符合本规程外,尚应符合国家现行有关标准的规定。

Technical specification for testing method with yideo monitor through the hole of foundation pile

ICS
CCS
P22
发布
2009-03-18
实施
2009-06-01

本规程适用于湿陷性黄土地区建筑基坑工程的勘察、设计、施工、检测、监测的技术安全及管理。

Technical specifications for safe retaining and protection of building foundation excavation engineering in collapsible loess regions

ICS
93.020
CCS
P22
发布
2009-03-15
实施
2009-07-01

Soil - Calculation of embankment failure and overall stability of retaining structures

ICS
93.020
CCS
P22
发布
2009-01
实施

5.1 Soil ORP, in conjunction with other soil characteristics such as electrical resistivity (see Test Methods G57 and G187), is used to predict corrosion tendencies of buried metallic structures (for example, pipelines and culverts. The ORP of the soil is one of many factors that influence structure service life. Its measurement is used in the design of new buried structures and in the evaluation of existing buried structures. 5.2 Soil ORP is a time-sensitive measurement. For an accurate indication of soil corrosivity, the measurement should be made as soon as practicable after removal of the soil sample from the ground. 5.3 The user of this test method is responsible for determining the significance of reported ORP measurements. ORP alone should typically not be used in characterizing the corrosivity of a particular soil. ORP measurements are appropriate when evaluating oxygen related reactions. 5.4 ORP measurements can sometimes be quite variable and non-reproducible. This is related, in part, to the general heterogeneity of a given soil. It is also related to the introduction of increased oxygen into the sample after extraction. The interpretation of soil ORP should be considered in terms of its general range rather than as an absolute measurement. 5.5 ORP measurements can be used to determine if a particular soil has the propensity to support microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) attack. These measurements can also be used to provide an indication of whether soil conditions will be aerobic or anaerobic. Appendix X1 provides reference guidelines for general interpretation of ORP data. 1.1 This test method covers a procedure and related test equipment for measuring oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) of soil samples removed from the ground. 1.2 The procedure in Section 9 is appropriate for field and laboratory measurements. 1.3 Accurate measurement of oxidation-reduction potential aids in the analysis of soil corrosivity and its impact on buried metallic structure corrosion rates. 1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Method for Measurement of Oxidation-Reduction Potential 40;ORP41; of Soil

ICS
13.080.30 (Biological properties of soil)
CCS
P22
发布
2009
实施

This guide is intended to provide a systematic approach for the application and execution of early actions for purposes of remediating both hazardous and non-hazardous contamination. Iterative development of a CSM is fundamental to the use of this guide. Anticipated users of this guide are owners or operators at sites of environmental contamination; technical professionals involved in the field of environmental site characterization and remediation; environmental regulators, property owners, employees, and residents adjacent to sites of environmental contamination; and lenders, sureties, and persons of general interest within an affected community. This guide is not intended to replace legal requirements for remediating sites of environmental contamination. This guide should be used to supplement existing regulatory guidance and to focus remedial efforts toward final remedy solutions.1.1 The purpose of this guide is to assist practitioners in the development, selection, design, and implementation of partial, short-term, or early action remedies undertaken at sites of waste contamination for the purpose of managing, controlling, or reducing risk posed by environmental site contamination. Early action remedies and strategies are applicable to the management of other regulatory processes (for example, state UST programs are equally applicable) in addition to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)/NCP process. this guide identifies and describes a standard process, technical requirements, information needs, benefits, and strategy for early actions. 1.2 This guide is applicable to both nonhazardous and hazardous sites of contamination as defined by CERCLA as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1986. 1.3 To the extent that this guide may be used for hazardous materials operations, it does not address the applicability of regulatory limitations and local requirements. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Guide for Developing and Implementing Short-Term Measures or Early Actions for Site Remediation

ICS
13.100 (Occupational safety. Industrial hygiene)
CCS
P22
发布
2009
实施



Copyright ©2007-2022 ANTPEDIA, All Rights Reserved
京ICP备07018254号 京公网安备1101085018 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:京ICP证110310号