ASME VV 10.1-2012
计算固体力学中验证和批准概念的例证

An Illustration of the Concepts of Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics

ASME VV 10.1-2012 发布历史

This Standard describes a simple example of verification and validation (V&V) to illustrate some of the key concepts and procedures presented in V&V 10. The example is an elastic, tapered, cantilever, box beam under nonuniform static loading. The validation problem entails a uniform loading over half the length of the beam. The response of interest is the tip deflection. The validation test plan and the metrics and accuracy requirements for comparing the calculated responses with measurements are specified in theV&VPlan, which is developed in the first phase of the V&V program. In setting validation requirements and establishing a budget for the V&V program, the V&V Plan considers the level of risk in using the model for its intended purpose. Successfully meeting the V&V requirements means that the computational model for the tapered beam has been validated for the intended use discussed in this document, viz., predicting the response of a tapered beam tested in the laboratory. The following two validation approaches were considered: (a) a case where uncertainty data were not available and obtained instead from subject matter experts. (b) a case where uncertainty data were available from repeat tests and calculations.

ASME VV 10.1-2012由美国机械工程师协会 US-ASME 发布于 2012。

ASME VV 10.1-2012 在中国标准分类中归属于: A42 物理学与力学，在国际标准分类中归属于: 35.160 微处理机系统。

ASME VV 10.1-2012的历代版本如下：

• 2012年 ASME VV 10.1-2012 计算固体力学中验证和批准概念的例证

非常抱歉，我们暂时无法提供预览，您可以试试： 免费下载 ASME VV 10.1-2012 前三页，或者稍后再访问。

注意： 点击下载后，生成下载文件时间比较长，请耐心等待......

标准号

ASME VV 10.1-2012

发布日期

2012年

实施日期

废止日期

无

中国标准分类号

A42

国际标准分类号

35.160

发布单位

US-ASME

适用范围

This Standard describes a simple example of verification and validation (V&V) to illustrate some of the key concepts and procedures presented in V&V 10. The example is an elastic, tapered, cantilever, box beam under nonuniform static loading. The validation problem entails a uniform loading over half the length of the beam. The response of interest is the tip deflection. The validation test plan and the metrics and accuracy requirements for comparing the calculated responses with measurements are specified in theV&VPlan, which is developed in the first phase of the V&V program. In setting validation requirements and establishing a budget for the V&V program, the V&V Plan considers the level of risk in using the model for its intended purpose. Successfully meeting the V&V requirements means that the computational model for the tapered beam has been validated for the intended use discussed in this document, viz., predicting the response of a tapered beam tested in the laboratory. The following two validation approaches were considered: (a) a case where uncertainty data were not available and obtained instead from subject matter experts. (b) a case where uncertainty data were available from repeat tests and calculations.