4.1 The allocation of limited resources (for example, time, money, regulatory oversight, qualified professionals) to any one petroleum release site necessarily influences corrective action decisions at other sites. This has spurred the search for innovative approaches to corrective action decision making, which still ensures that human health and the environment are protected.
4.2 The RBCA process presented in this guide is a consistent, streamlined decision process for selecting corrective actions at petroleum release sites. Advantages of the RBCA approach are as follows:
4.2.1 Decisions are based on reducing the risk of adverse human or environmental impacts,
4.2.2 Site assessment activities are focussed on collecting only that information that is necessary to making risk-based corrective action decisions,
4.2.3 Limited resources are focussed on those sites that pose the greatest risk to human health and the environment at any time,
4.2.4 The remedial action achieves an acceptable degree of exposure and risk reduction,
4.2.5 Compliance can be evaluated relative to site-specific standards applied at site-specific point(s) of compliance,
4.2.6 Higher quality, and in some cases faster, cleanups than are currently realized, and
4.2.7 A documentation and demonstration that the remedial action is protective of human health, safety, and the environment.
4.3 Risk assessment is a developing science. The scientific approach used to develop the RBSL and SSTL may vary by state and user due to regulatory requirements and the use of alternative scientifically based methods.
4.4 Activities described in this guide should be conducted by a person familiar with current risk and exposure assessment methodologies.
4.5 In order to properly apply the RBCA process, the user should avoid the following:
4.5.1 Use of Tier 1 RBSLs as mandated remediation standards rather than screening levels,
4.5.2 Restriction of the RBCA process to Tier 1 evaluation only and not allowing Tier 2 or Tier 3 analyses,
4.5.3 Placing arbitrary time constraints on the corrective action process; for example, requiring that Tiers 1, 2, and 3 be completed within 30-day time periods that do not reflect the actual urgency of and risks posed by the site,
4.5.4 Use of the RBCA process only when active remediation is not technically feasible, rather than ......
“95”表示暴露在规定数量的专用试验粒子下,熔喷滤料内的粒子浓度要比熔喷滤料外粒子浓度低95%以上。N95不是特定的产品名称,只要符合N95标准,并且通过NIOSH审查的产品就可以称为“N95型熔喷滤料”。医疗现场为防止感染,以及劳动作业时,必须确保工人免受工作场所可吸入危险物质的伤害,作业时必须佩戴熔喷滤料等呼吸器。...
医疗现场为防止感染,以及劳动作业时,必须确保工人免受工作场所可吸入危险物质的伤害,作业时必须佩戴熔喷滤料等呼吸器。结合自己的面部特征来选择熔喷滤料等呼吸器,并对熔喷滤料等呼吸器与面部之间的密合度进行评估,检验是否存在使工人处于危险之中的缝隙或泄漏点。 能够快速的完成熔喷滤料等呼吸器的密合度实验,确保其提供良好的防护性能。安全专家也将针对密合度实验结果来制定防护方案及标准法规。...
Copyright ©2007-2022 ANTPEDIA, All Rights Reserved
京ICP备07018254号 京公网安备1101085018 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:京ICP证110310号