共找到 215 条与 办公机械 相关的标准,共 15 页
This classification contains pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for performance to support typical office work. Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1 through 6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1 through 6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1 through 6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability. The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1 through 6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing. This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared. This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E 1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E 1334. Each requires the other.
Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Support for Office Work (04.11)
Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Meetings and Group Effectiveness (04.11)
Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Sound and Visual Environment (04.11)
This classification contains pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for protection of a building or site. Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 2 through 7, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 2 through 7) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2 through 7) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability. The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2 through 7) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing. This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared. This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E 1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E 1334. Each requires the other.
Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Facility Protection (04.11)
This classification covers pairs of scales (see ) for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for manageability. Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales (see ) are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the facility rating scale is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability. The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see ) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group, over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing. This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared. This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability, but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E 1334. The scales in are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E 1334. Each requires the other.
Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Manageability
1. OBJEt 1.1 La présente norme énonce les exigences des feuilles de carbone, du type pellicule de plastique, enduites de solvant, utilisées avec des machines à écrire manuelles et électriques. 1.2 La mise à l'essai et l'évaluation d'un produit en regard de la présente norme peuvent nécessiter l'emploi de matériaux ou d'équipement susceptibles d'être dangereux. Le présent document n'entend pas traiter de tous les aspects liés à la sécurité de son utilisation. Il appartient à l'usager de la norme de se renseigner auprès des autorités compétentes et d'adopter des pratiques d'hygiène et de sécurité conformes aux règlements en vigueur avant de l'utiliser.
Solvent coated carbon sheet, film type
1. OBJEt 1.1 La présente norme énonce les exigences du papier carbone à fini moyen et enduit d'encre, utilisé avec des machines à écrire manuelles et électriques. 1.2 La mise à l'essai et l'évaluation d'un produit en regard de la présente norme peuvent nécessiter l'emploi de matériaux ou d'équipement susceptibles d'être dangereux. Le présent document n'entend pas traiter de tous les aspects liés à la sécurité de son utilisation. Il appartient à l'usager de la norme de se renseigner auprès des autorités compétentes et d'adopter des pratiques d'hygiène et de sécurité conformes aux règlements en vigueur avant de l'utiliser.
Carbon paper for typewriter
この規格は,電子式金銭登録機(以下,機器という。)の試験方法について規定する。
Electronic cash registers -- Test method
The test methods described can be used to evaluate acceptability of fabric ribbon welds on a comparative basis. Some, though not all, tests may also be used for manufacturing control. The weld durability test is exclusively for manufacturing control, since it involves in-process testing. Users may choose to perform any or all of the tests described, depending upon results desired and equipment available.1.1 These test methods are for evaluating ribbon welds in fabric cartridges that do not contain endless woven loops. These test methods apply to ribbon welds made with ultrasonic energy but do not cover special-purpose welds such as overlap or butt welds. Physical characteristics of ribbon welds and test performance may be used to predict acceptable function and printing life of the weld in the finished cartridge. These test methods are suitable both for comparative evaluations by end-users and for manufacturing control within the ribbon product industry. 1.2 Since types of ribbon welds and equipment vary, similar fabric cartridges may not contain the same type of ribbon weld. Any evaluation comparing products from different sources should note this. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Standard Test Methods for Determining Acceptability of Ribbon Welds in Fabric Cartridges
本标准适用于打印机,是考核打印机产品质量等级的依据。 本标准必须与GB 9314或企业标准一起使用。
Quality grading standard for serial impact dot matrix printers
La présente norme énonce les exigences relatives aux reliures conçues pour retenir des feuillets mobiles au moyen d'anneaux en acier ronds, en forme de d droit ou en angle.
Loose-leaf ring binder
Настоящий стандарт распространяется на сердечники катушек, предназначенных для красящих лент шириной 8 мм на бумажной или полимерной осн
Paper or plastic printing ribbons. Characteristics of cores
This standard provides a performance-oriented keyboard arrangement that is an alternative to the keyboard presented in American National Standard for office machines and supplies - Alphanumeric machines - Keyboard arrangement, ANSI X3.154. This standard describes the arrangement of the 48 basic printing keys on the keyboard and the characters, uppercase and lowercase, that appear on the keys. The character assignments are divided into five application areas, in recognition of the different graphic character requirements of these application areas.
Office Machines and Supplies - Alphanumeric Machines - Alternate Keyboard Arrangement Replaces ANSI X3.207-1991 [Replaced: ANSI X3.207]
MIL-D-81607(AS) (l), dated 2 August 1971, has been reviewed and determined to be valid for use in acquisition.
DISPLAY UNIT, TELETYPEWRITER TT-581/AG AND MOUNTING, MT-4088/AG
This test method is used to compare the relative erasability of similar ribbons having approximately the same amount (degree) of ink (inking) transfer capability. It is suitable for compiling rankings for comparative testing against a control ribbon for service evaluation and quality control (research).1.1 This test method covers the determination of the erasability of inked ribbons. 1.2 Results are expressed in visual ranking order or in comparison to a control. 1.3 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Standard Test Method for Determining the Erasability of Inked Ribbons
S'applique à divers types de rubans-films utilisés avec les machines à écrire, les machines de traitement de textes et les imprimantes et aux bandes saisie-erreur utilisées avec les rubans correcteurs.
Film ribbon for typewriters and word processing machines
この規格は,電子式金銭登録機の仕様書の様式及び記入要領について規定する。
Format of specification for electronic cash registers
Format of specification for time recorder
Mechanical and electric typewriters. General requirements and test methods
Copyright ©2007-2022 ANTPEDIA, All Rights Reserved
京ICP备07018254号 京公网安备1101085018 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:京ICP证110310号