77.020 金属生产 标准查询与下载



共找到 96 条与 金属生产 相关的标准,共 7

This Standard establishes a preferred series of metric thicknesses, widths, and lengths for flat metal products of rectangular cross-section. The thicknesses and widths shown in this Standard are also applicable to base metals that may be coated in later operations. This Standard also establishes a preferred series of metric sizes for round, square, rectangular, and hexagonal metal products.

Preferred Metric Sizes for Flat, Round, Square, Rectangular, and Hexagonal Metal Products

ICS
77.020
CCS
H04
发布
2005-09-12
实施

Establishes a preferred series of metric thicknesses, a preferred series of metric widths, and a preferred series of metric lengths for flat metal products of rectangular cross section. The thicknesses and widths shown in this Standard are also applicabl

Preferred Metric Sizes for Flat, Round, Square, Rectangle, and Hexagon Metal Products

ICS
77.020
CCS
H46
发布
2005-02-11
实施

A major concern of metals producers, warehouses, and users is to establish and maintain the identity of metals from melting to their final application. This involves the use of standard quality assurance practices and procedures throughout the various stages of manufacturing and processing, at warehouses and materials receiving, and during fabrication and final installation of the product. These practices typically involve standard chemical analyses and physical tests to meet product acceptance standards, which are slow. Several pieces from a production run are usually destroyed or rendered unusable through mechanical and chemical testing, and the results are used to assess the entire lot using statistical methods. Statistical quality assurance methods are usually effective; however, mixed grades, off-chemistry, and nonstandard physical properties remain the primary causes for claims in the metals industry. A more comprehensive verification of product properties is necessary. Nondestructive means are available to supplement conventional metals grade verification techniques, and to monitor chemical and physical properties at selected production stages, in order to assist in maintaining the identities of metals and their consistency in mechanical properties. Nondestructive methods have the potential for monitoring grade during production on a continuous or statistical basis, for monitoring properties such as hardness and case depth, and for verifying the effectiveness of heat treatment, cold-working, and the like. They are quite often used in the field for solving problems involving off-grade and mixed-grade materials. The nondestructive methods covered in this guide provide both direct and indirect responses to the sample being evaluated. Spectrometric analysis instruments respond to the presence and percents of alloying constituents. The electromagnetic (eddy current) and thermoelectric methods, on the other hand, are among those that respond to properties in the sample that are affected by chemistry and processing, and they yield indirect information on composition and mechanical properties. In this guide, the spectrometric methods are classified as quantitative, whereas the methods that yield indirect readings are termed qualitative. This guide describes a variety of qualitative and quantitative methods. It summarizes the operating principles of each method, provides guidance on where and how each may be applied, gives (when applicable) the precision and bias that may be expected, and assists the investigator in selecting the best candidates for specific grade verification or sorting problems. For the purposes of this guide, the term “nondestructive” includes techniques that may require the removal of small amounts of metal during the examination, without affecting the serviceability of the product. The nondestructive methods covered in this guide provide quantitative and qualitative information on metals properties; they are listed as follows: Quantitative: X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, and Optical emission spectrometry. Qualitative: Electromagnetic (eddy current), Conductivity/resistivity, Thermoelectric, Chemical spot tests, Triboelectric, and Spark testing (special case).1.1 This guide is intended for tutorial purposes only. It describes the general requirements, methods, and procedures for the nondestructive identification and sorting of metals. 1.2 It provides guidelines for the selection and use of methods suited to the requirements of particular metals sorting or identification problems. 1.3

Standard Guide for Metals Identification, Grade Verification, and Sorting

ICS
77.020
CCS
H04
发布
2004
实施

Light metals and their alloys-Terms and definitions-Part 5 : Methods of processing and treatment

ICS
77.020
CCS
发布
2002-12-18
实施

Recarburizers for steelmaking

ICS
77.020
CCS
H30
发布
2001-07-09
实施
2002-01-01

The CO2 reactivity rates are used to quantify the tendency of a carbon artifact to react with carbon dioxide. Carbon consumed by these unwanted side reactions is unavailable for the primary reactions of reducing alumina to the primary metal. CO2 dusting rates are used to quantify the tendency of the coke aggregate or binder coke of a carbon artifact to selectively react with these gases. Preferential attack of the binder coke or coke aggregate of a carbon artifact by these gases causes some carbon to fall off or dust, making the carbon unavailable for the primary reaction of reducing alumina and, more importantly, reducing the efficiency of the aluminum reduction cell. Comparison of CO2 reactivity and dusting rates is useful in selecting raw materials for the manufacture of commercial anodes for specific smelting technologies in the aluminum reduction industry. CO2 reactivity rates are used for evaluating effectiveness and beneficiation processes or for research purposes.1.1 This test method covers the thermogravimetric (TGA) determination of CO2 reactivity and dusting of shaped carbon anodes and cathode blocks used in the aluminum reduction industry. The apparatus selection covers a significant variety of types with various thermal conditions, sample size capability, materials of construction, and procedures for determining the mass loss and subsequent rate of reaction. This test method standardizes the variables of sample dimensions, reaction temperature, gas velocity over the exposed surfaces, and reaction time such that results obtained on different apparatuses are correlatable. 1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Method for Determination of TGA CO2 Reactivity of Baked Carbon Anodes and Cathode Blocks

ICS
77.020
CCS
A29
发布
2000-01-01
实施

5.1 The CO2 reactivity rates are used to quantify the tendency of a carbon artifact to react with carbon dioxide. Carbon consumed by these unwanted side reactions is unavailable for the primary reactions of reducing alumina to the primary metal. CO2 dusting rates are used to quantify the tendency of the coke aggregate or binder coke of a carbon artifact to selectively react with these gases. Preferential attack of the binder coke or coke aggregate of a carbon artifact by these gases causes some carbon to fall off or dust, making the carbon unavailable for the primary reaction of reducing alumina and, more importantly, reducing the efficiency of the aluminum reduction cell. 5.2 Comparison of CO2 reactivity and dusting rates is useful in selecting raw materials for the manufacture of commercial anodes for specific smelting technologies in the aluminum reduction industry. 5.3 CO2 reactivity rates are used for evaluating effectiveness and beneficiation processes or for research purposes. 1.1 This test method covers the thermogravimetric (TGA) determination of CO2 reactivity and dusting of shaped carbon anodes and cathode blocks used in the aluminum reduction industry. The apparatus selection covers a significant variety of types with various thermal conditions, sample size capability, materials of construction, and procedures for determining the mass loss and subsequent rate of reaction. This test method standardizes the variables of sample dimensions, reaction temperature, gas velocity over the exposed surfaces, and reaction time such that results obtained on different apparatuses are correlatable. 1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Standard Test Method for Determination of TGA CO2 Reactivity of Baked Carbon Anodes and Cathode Blocks

ICS
77.020
CCS
发布
2000
实施

This SAE Recommended Practice describes a unified numbering system (UNS) for metals and alloys which have a commercial standing and covers the procedure by which such numbers are assigned. Section 2 describes the system of alphanumeric designations or numbers established for each family of metals and alloys. Section 3 outlines the organization established for administering the system. Section 4 describes the procedure for requesting number assignment to metals and alloys for which UNS numbers have not previously been assigned. The UNS provides a means of correlating many nationally used numbering systems currently administered by societies, trade associations, and individual users and producers of metals and alloys, thereby avoiding confusion caused by use of more than one identification number for the same material; and by the opposite situation of having the same number assigned to two or more entirely different materials. It provides, also, the uniformity necessary for efficient indexing, record keeping, data storage and retrieval, and cross referencing. A UNS number is not in itself a specification, since it establishes no requirements for form, condition, quality, etc. It is a unified identification of metals and alloys for which controlling limits have been established in specifications published elsewhere.

Numbering Metals and Alloys

ICS
77.020
CCS
H04
发布
1995-07-01
实施
2002-02-22

Schválenie ST SEV 496-87 odporu?ilo Federálně ministerstvo hut-níctva a ?a?kého strojárstva. Spracovatel: Oravské ferozliatinárske závody n. p. Istebné, I?O 011134 - Ing. ?tefan Janiga Odborové normaliza?ně st?edisko: V?zkumn? ústav hutnictví ?eleza, ú?elová organizace Dobrá, I?O 011398 — Ing. Jitka Jáchymova Pracovník Federálního ú?adu pro normalizaci a mě?ení: Milan Skoták

Silicocalcium

ICS
77.020
CCS
发布
1989-01-03
实施

Steel products. Quality assurance.

ICS
77.020
CCS
H40
发布
1986-05-01
实施
1986-05-20

Zpracovatel; RD JESEN?K, n. p., Jeseník — Jan Antorin Oborové normaliza?ní st?edisko: Ostav pro v?zkum rud, Praha — M. Kvapil Pracovník Gradu pro normalizaci a mě?ení: Ing. Milena Veselá

Foundry graphite and fillers. Common provisions

ICS
77.020
CCS
发布
1986-03-07
实施

Quality control surveillance of steel products.

ICS
77.020
CCS
H40
发布
1983-08-01
实施
1983-08-18

Настоящий стандарт устанавливает масштабы изображения фотоснимков, изготовленных при металлографических методах исследования. Настоящ

Metals scales of images on photographs at metallographec examination

ICS
77.020
CCS
发布
1982
实施
1984-01-01

Flux for electro-slag remelting. General requirements for methods analysis

ICS
77.020
CCS
发布
1976
实施
1977-07-01

Survey of groups and subgroups of standards of class 42 - Metallurgy

ICS
77.020
CCS
发布
1974-9-5
实施

Dense refractory castables --Determination of sieve analysis

ICS
77.020
CCS
H30
发布
实施



Copyright ©2007-2022 ANTPEDIA, All Rights Reserved
京ICP备07018254号 京公网安备1101085018 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:京ICP证110310号